In a habeas corpus case, the district court's denial of defendant's 28 U.S.C. section 2255 motion is vacated and remanded where: 1) defendant's case is not moot because success would shorten his supervised release term; 2) jurisdiction exists because cognizability is not always a jurisdictional limit; 3) the district court should determine whether defendant is entitled to reinstate his 2008 motion under F.R.C.P. Rule 60; and 4) Begay v. US, 553 U.S. 137 (2008), applies retroactively and error is cognizable on collateral review where not defaulted.

Local News and Events

Jun 01, 2021
Medical malpractice covers a broad range of actions or inactions that result in harm to those under the care of medical professionals. Although doctors, nurses and similar practitioners are only human…
Read More »
May 03, 2021
The busy roads of Georgia experience serious road accidents in the tens of thousands each year. In many cases, these collisions are the result of careless or distracted driving. However, there are also…
Read More »
Apr 05, 2021
Georgia is home to a wealth of talent from across the music, TV and movie industries. If you have something to offer to the world, it makes sense to protect your creative output. All too often, artists…
Read More »
Mar 02, 2021
Being involved in any car accident can be a stressful and overwhelming time for anyone, whether you are the at-fault driver, a third party or a passenger.
Read More »