In a habeas corpus case, the district court's denial of defendant's 28 U.S.C. section 2255 motion is vacated and remanded where: 1) defendant's case is not moot because success would shorten his supervised release term; 2) jurisdiction exists because cognizability is not always a jurisdictional limit; 3) the district court should determine whether defendant is entitled to reinstate his 2008 motion under F.R.C.P. Rule 60; and 4) Begay v. US, 553 U.S. 137 (2008), applies retroactively and error is cognizable on collateral review where not defaulted.

Local News and Events

Nov 14, 2019
Regaining your confidence after a car accident may be a difficult journey. Being realistic about getting back behind the wheel is a healthy attitude, even if the prospect terrifies you. You don’t have…
Read More »
Oct 28, 2019
Buying and selling a home can be a stressful time. A real estate attorney could help alleviate some of the stress. A real estate attorney can help navigate the legalities of a transfer of ownership. A…
Read More »
Sep 30, 2019
According to Law.com, search and seizure is defined as an examination of a person’s premises (residence, business, or vehicle) by law enforcement officers looking for evidence of the commission of a crime,…
Read More »
Aug 28, 2019
A personal injury happens when a person’s mind, body, or emotions are injured as a result of the negligence or wrongful behavior of another person. An accident can happen in the blink of an eye whether…
Read More »