In a habeas corpus case, the district court's denial of defendant's 28 U.S.C. section 2255 motion is vacated and remanded where: 1) defendant's case is not moot because success would shorten his supervised release term; 2) jurisdiction exists because cognizability is not always a jurisdictional limit; 3) the district court should determine whether defendant is entitled to reinstate his 2008 motion under F.R.C.P. Rule 60; and 4) Begay v. US, 553 U.S. 137 (2008), applies retroactively and error is cognizable on collateral review where not defaulted.

Local News and Events

Jan 07, 2020
It may make you uncomfortable to learn that your attorney believes that all sides matter. In fact, a good attorney will understand the importance of fair representation in accordance with our justice…
Read More »
Dec 05, 2019
Shoplifting is considered a serious crime in Georgia, and those found guilty can face severe criminal and civil reprisals.
Read More »
Nov 14, 2019
Regaining your confidence after a car accident may be a difficult journey. Being realistic about getting back behind the wheel is a healthy attitude, even if the prospect terrifies you. You don’t have…
Read More »
Oct 28, 2019
Buying and selling a home can be a stressful time. A real estate attorney could help alleviate some of the stress. A real estate attorney can help navigate the legalities of a transfer of ownership. A…
Read More »