Conviction for knowingly participating in the use of extortionate means to collect or attempt to collect an extension of credit, under 18 U.S.C. section 894, is affirmed over defendant's challenges that: 1) the District Court chose the wrong remedy for the prosecution's gender-based discrimination in the use of peremptory challenges during jury selection; 2) the evidence at trial was insufficient to support a finding that his voicemail message conveyed an implicit threat of violence and because the government failed to put on any other evidence that could suffice to prove that he had done so; and 3) the District Court's erred in its refusal to instruct the jury regarding whether defendant specifically intended to cause fear in victim and whether defendant was too intoxicated at the time he left the voicemail message to have had such a specific intent.

Local News and Events

Jan 03, 2022
Although difficult divorces do sometimes happen in real life, the reality is many couples mutually decide to dissolve the relationship. Although still a challenging time, the separating couple can often…
Read More »
Dec 06, 2021
Getting into a crash where another driver or passenger dies may result in alleged vehicular homicide, depending on the circumstances of the accident. If you have been accused of this serious crime, seeking…
Read More »
Nov 01, 2021
The American economy depends so much on the trucking industry, but sometimes you may find yourself on the receiving end of a traffic violation or other infraction. If you believe you received a ticket…
Read More »
Oct 04, 2021
Divorce is difficult for everyone, but if there are children involved, it is crucial to ensure a proper parenting plan is in place, especially as the holiday season draws near. A well-written parenting…
Read More »