Conviction for knowingly participating in the use of extortionate means to collect or attempt to collect an extension of credit, under 18 U.S.C. section 894, is affirmed over defendant's challenges that: 1) the District Court chose the wrong remedy for the prosecution's gender-based discrimination in the use of peremptory challenges during jury selection; 2) the evidence at trial was insufficient to support a finding that his voicemail message conveyed an implicit threat of violence and because the government failed to put on any other evidence that could suffice to prove that he had done so; and 3) the District Court's erred in its refusal to instruct the jury regarding whether defendant specifically intended to cause fear in victim and whether defendant was too intoxicated at the time he left the voicemail message to have had such a specific intent.

Local News and Events

Oct 15, 2020
Fraud is a serious charge with potentially serious consequences. When you are charged with fraud, you need a criminal defense attorney who is not afraid of meticulous detail work and research. Fraud charges…
Read More »
Sep 09, 2020
Business contracts are tricky. There is no blueprint that you can simply adapt to your needs. Whether you are dealing with lenders, suppliers or clients, it is important that any contractual agreements…
Read More »
Aug 18, 2020
Divorce is a difficult time, and ensuring children are taken care of should be at the top of each parent’s list. The stress that exists during divorce can sometimes make it difficult to keep thoughts coherent,…
Read More »
Jul 08, 2020
The loss of a loved one is always a tragic event, but when your loved one dies due to the reckless, criminal or negligent act of another person, the tragedy can sometimes be too much to bear. If you have…
Read More »