Conviction for knowingly participating in the use of extortionate means to collect or attempt to collect an extension of credit, under 18 U.S.C. section 894, is affirmed over defendant's challenges that: 1) the District Court chose the wrong remedy for the prosecution's gender-based discrimination in the use of peremptory challenges during jury selection; 2) the evidence at trial was insufficient to support a finding that his voicemail message conveyed an implicit threat of violence and because the government failed to put on any other evidence that could suffice to prove that he had done so; and 3) the District Court's erred in its refusal to instruct the jury regarding whether defendant specifically intended to cause fear in victim and whether defendant was too intoxicated at the time he left the voicemail message to have had such a specific intent.

Local News and Events

Nov 14, 2019
Regaining your confidence after a car accident may be a difficult journey. Being realistic about getting back behind the wheel is a healthy attitude, even if the prospect terrifies you. You don’t have…
Read More »
Oct 28, 2019
Buying and selling a home can be a stressful time. A real estate attorney could help alleviate some of the stress. A real estate attorney can help navigate the legalities of a transfer of ownership. A…
Read More »
Sep 30, 2019
According to Law.com, search and seizure is defined as an examination of a person’s premises (residence, business, or vehicle) by law enforcement officers looking for evidence of the commission of a crime,…
Read More »
Aug 28, 2019
A personal injury happens when a person’s mind, body, or emotions are injured as a result of the negligence or wrongful behavior of another person. An accident can happen in the blink of an eye whether…
Read More »