Conviction for knowingly participating in the use of extortionate means to collect or attempt to collect an extension of credit, under 18 U.S.C. section 894, is affirmed over defendant's challenges that: 1) the District Court chose the wrong remedy for the prosecution's gender-based discrimination in the use of peremptory challenges during jury selection; 2) the evidence at trial was insufficient to support a finding that his voicemail message conveyed an implicit threat of violence and because the government failed to put on any other evidence that could suffice to prove that he had done so; and 3) the District Court's erred in its refusal to instruct the jury regarding whether defendant specifically intended to cause fear in victim and whether defendant was too intoxicated at the time he left the voicemail message to have had such a specific intent.

Local News and Events

Jan 12, 2021
No parent wants to put their children in the middle of a custody battle, but for many divorced parents, this is the result. The goal of divorced parents should be to ensure their children emerge from divorce…
Read More »
Dec 07, 2020
A first-time DUI can have more serious consequences than you may think.
Read More »
Nov 02, 2020
Most people who seek compensation after a car accident are not thinking about becoming rich. The money that injury victims are awarded is typically intended to cover various losses incurred because of…
Read More »
Oct 15, 2020
Fraud is a serious charge with potentially serious consequences. When you are charged with fraud, you need a criminal defense attorney who is not afraid of meticulous detail work and research. Fraud charges…
Read More »