Conviction for knowingly participating in the use of extortionate means to collect or attempt to collect an extension of credit, under 18 U.S.C. section 894, is affirmed over defendant's challenges that: 1) the District Court chose the wrong remedy for the prosecution's gender-based discrimination in the use of peremptory challenges during jury selection; 2) the evidence at trial was insufficient to support a finding that his voicemail message conveyed an implicit threat of violence and because the government failed to put on any other evidence that could suffice to prove that he had done so; and 3) the District Court's erred in its refusal to instruct the jury regarding whether defendant specifically intended to cause fear in victim and whether defendant was too intoxicated at the time he left the voicemail message to have had such a specific intent.

Local News and Events

Mar 22, 2019
Whether one has anticipated a divorce or not, the process is far from easy. Even for those that intend on proceeding amicably, issues can arise that ignite emotions and cause tremendous stress. As such,…
Read More »
Feb 25, 2019
In the context of “crimes” and other offenses, traffic violations might seem petty. Yet, the truth is—a wide range of traffic-related offenses have the potential to produce serious consequences for those…
Read More »
Jan 28, 2019
Given the number of police and crime dramas on television, not to mention the live-action footage of arrests and police interrogations, many people are aware of statements known as Miranda Rights. For…
Read More »
Dec 27, 2018
In referencing an automobile collision that occurred in May of 1995, FindLaw discusses elements of the Family Purpose Doctrine and the idea of “vicarious liability.” In essence, if the owner of an automobile…
Read More »