Conviction for knowingly participating in the use of extortionate means to collect or attempt to collect an extension of credit, under 18 U.S.C. section 894, is affirmed over defendant's challenges that: 1) the District Court chose the wrong remedy for the prosecution's gender-based discrimination in the use of peremptory challenges during jury selection; 2) the evidence at trial was insufficient to support a finding that his voicemail message conveyed an implicit threat of violence and because the government failed to put on any other evidence that could suffice to prove that he had done so; and 3) the District Court's erred in its refusal to instruct the jury regarding whether defendant specifically intended to cause fear in victim and whether defendant was too intoxicated at the time he left the voicemail message to have had such a specific intent.

Local News and Events

Nov 21, 2022
Negotiating any financial contract is fraught with potential perils. You are dealing with complex arrangements that could impact your business – or you, personally. Having the right legal help is recommended…
Read More »
Oct 03, 2022
If you are convicted with a DUI charge in Georgia, you could be facing serious repercussions. An experienced criminal defense attorney may be able to help you minimize these effects. Here are the three…
Read More »
Sep 01, 2022
Entering the entertainment industry can be a very profitable career, but it has many pitfalls to avoid. If you get your “big break” as a singer, actor or other niche, take a moment to consider your future.…
Read More »
Aug 01, 2022
Contracts are an integral part of your business. These contracts rely on both parties being able to perform specific duties and obligations detailed in the documentation. At times, misunderstandings and…
Read More »