In a habeas corpus case challenging petitioner's conviction for production of child pornography and related offenses, the district court's denial of the 28 U.S.C. section 2255 petition as time barred is affirmed and the court held that a judgment imposing sentence but leaving the amount of restitution to be determined begins to run the one-year statute of limitations to file a habeas motion under section 2255, and does not restart when the specific amount of restitution is later entered.

Local News and Events

Nov 21, 2022
Negotiating any financial contract is fraught with potential perils. You are dealing with complex arrangements that could impact your business – or you, personally. Having the right legal help is recommended…
Read More »
Oct 03, 2022
If you are convicted with a DUI charge in Georgia, you could be facing serious repercussions. An experienced criminal defense attorney may be able to help you minimize these effects. Here are the three…
Read More »
Sep 01, 2022
Entering the entertainment industry can be a very profitable career, but it has many pitfalls to avoid. If you get your “big break” as a singer, actor or other niche, take a moment to consider your future.…
Read More »
Aug 01, 2022
Contracts are an integral part of your business. These contracts rely on both parties being able to perform specific duties and obligations detailed in the documentation. At times, misunderstandings and…
Read More »