In a habeas corpus case challenging petitioner's conviction for production of child pornography and related offenses, the district court's denial of the 28 U.S.C. section 2255 petition as time barred is affirmed and the court held that a judgment imposing sentence but leaving the amount of restitution to be determined begins to run the one-year statute of limitations to file a habeas motion under section 2255, and does not restart when the specific amount of restitution is later entered.

Local News and Events

Apr 05, 2021
Georgia is home to a wealth of talent from across the music, TV and movie industries. If you have something to offer to the world, it makes sense to protect your creative output. All too often, artists…
Read More »
Mar 02, 2021
Being involved in any car accident can be a stressful and overwhelming time for anyone, whether you are the at-fault driver, a third party or a passenger.
Read More »
Feb 05, 2021
Using a ready-made contract template may be tempting. They can be an inexpensive, and sometimes free, option for many small business needs. However, these generic contracts could leave your business vulnerable…
Read More »
Jan 12, 2021
No parent wants to put their children in the middle of a custody battle, but for many divorced parents, this is the result. The goal of divorced parents should be to ensure their children emerge from divorce…
Read More »