In a writ petition challenging the juvenile court's denial of reunification services to D.F. under Welfare and Institutions Code section 361.5, subdivision (b)(11), the court distinguished subdivision (b)(11) from subdivision (b)(10) and Melissa R. v. Superior Court, 207 Cal. App.4th 816 (2012), to hold that the plain language of (b)(11) allows for the bypass of reunification services when termination of services and removal as to a sibling have occurred outside of California.

Local News and Events

Jun 22, 2022
As a freelancer, you will encounter situations that require mutual agreements with your clients. A business contract can set out expectations for both parties, ensuring there is no ambiguity related to…
Read More »
May 03, 2022
Drivers who have been convicted of multiple DUIs in Georgia may have questions about the legal process, especially if they have already had their license suspended or faced jail time. Driving under the…
Read More »
Apr 04, 2022
If you have been involved in a Georgia car accident, there are expected and unexpected costs. The former will include vehicle repairs, medical bills and loss of earnings. However, there are several potential…
Read More »
Mar 22, 2022
Trucks and other large vehicles are difficult to maneuver due to their size and weight. While truck drivers are expected to achieve higher standards of safety on our roads, other drivers should also give…
Read More »