In a writ petition challenging the juvenile court's denial of reunification services to D.F. under Welfare and Institutions Code section 361.5, subdivision (b)(11), the court distinguished subdivision (b)(11) from subdivision (b)(10) and Melissa R. v. Superior Court, 207 Cal. App.4th 816 (2012), to hold that the plain language of (b)(11) allows for the bypass of reunification services when termination of services and removal as to a sibling have occurred outside of California.

Local News and Events

Sep 01, 2021
Any contract is a set of promises that is legally enforceable. Breaking the agreements set by the contract can result in one party taking legal action against the other. If you negotiate a contract without…
Read More »
Aug 02, 2021
Kids get into a lot of mischief and seldom intend to cause serious harm or damage to property. Unfortunately, sometimes high jinks go too far and could lead to an encounter with the law. When that happens,…
Read More »
Jul 15, 2021
When vehicular homicide is charged, you need an experienced defense attorney. Vehicular homicide is a serious charge and can change your future permanently. You need an attorney who is experienced in fighting…
Read More »
Jun 01, 2021
Medical malpractice covers a broad range of actions or inactions that result in harm to those under the care of medical professionals. Although doctors, nurses and similar practitioners are only human…
Read More »