November 20, 2015
In an appeal of a trial court order that ex-wife pay, pursuant to Family Code section 2030 and 271, certain amounts to a claimant subject to a specified offset to ex-husband, the court's order is affirmed over the meritless claim that the court erred by combining cost shifting pursuant to section 2030 with sanctions pursuant to section 271, making no explicit differentiation between sums awarded pursuant to each statute.
Local News and Events
Dec 27, 2018
In referencing an automobile collision that occurred in May of 1995, FindLaw discusses elements of the Family Purpose Doctrine and the idea of “vicarious liability.” In essence, if the owner of an automobile…
Read More »
Read More »
Nov 27, 2018
When unwed parents have a child in the state of Georgia, there are necessary steps required to establish paternity, and this process often begins in the hospital where both parents sign a Paternity Acknowledgement…
Read More »
Read More »
Oct 29, 2018
Taking many forms, fraud is a general term used to describe the deliberate deception of a person by another for his or her own gain. Typically, an individual or entity will resort to fraud in order to…
Read More »
Read More »
Sep 26, 2018
In the aftermath of a devastating car wreck, some individuals face injuries and impairments that will affect them for the rest of their lives. Unfortunately, many can no longer perform their job duties,…
Read More »
Read More »