November 20, 2015
In an appeal of a trial court order that ex-wife pay, pursuant to Family Code section 2030 and 271, certain amounts to a claimant subject to a specified offset to ex-husband, the court's order is affirmed over the meritless claim that the court erred by combining cost shifting pursuant to section 2030 with sanctions pursuant to section 271, making no explicit differentiation between sums awarded pursuant to each statute.
Local News and Events
Mar 22, 2019
Whether one has anticipated a divorce or not, the process is far from easy. Even for those that intend on proceeding amicably, issues can arise that ignite emotions and cause tremendous stress. As such,…
Read More »
Read More »
Feb 25, 2019
In the context of “crimes” and other offenses, traffic violations might seem petty. Yet, the truth is—a wide range of traffic-related offenses have the potential to produce serious consequences for those…
Read More »
Read More »
Jan 28, 2019
Given the number of police and crime dramas on television, not to mention the live-action footage of arrests and police interrogations, many people are aware of statements known as Miranda Rights. For…
Read More »
Read More »
Dec 27, 2018
In referencing an automobile collision that occurred in May of 1995, FindLaw discusses elements of the Family Purpose Doctrine and the idea of “vicarious liability.” In essence, if the owner of an automobile…
Read More »
Read More »