November 20, 2015
In an appeal of a trial court order that ex-wife pay, pursuant to Family Code section 2030 and 271, certain amounts to a claimant subject to a specified offset to ex-husband, the court's order is affirmed over the meritless claim that the court erred by combining cost shifting pursuant to section 2030 with sanctions pursuant to section 271, making no explicit differentiation between sums awarded pursuant to each statute.
Local News and Events
Jun 02, 2020
Divorce and child custody are trying situations even in the best of times. If your former partner refuses to follow a court order, the problems only multiply. The court hands down decisions after careful…
Read More »
Read More »
May 04, 2020
Autism spectrum disorder was first recognized by Dr. Leo at Johns Hopkins Hospital in 1942. Historical accounts indicate that autism has existed for many years before it was officially recognized. Since…
Read More »
Read More »
Apr 03, 2020
It is not uncommon for people to have to travel for work in this global economy. If you are facing divorce and custody arrangements, this necessary travel may come up for discussion. It is important to…
Read More »
Read More »
Mar 16, 2020
If you are an up-and-coming recording artist, record companies and producers may start approaching you to sign with their label.
Read More »
Read More »