November 20, 2015
In an appeal of a trial court order that ex-wife pay, pursuant to Family Code section 2030 and 271, certain amounts to a claimant subject to a specified offset to ex-husband, the court's order is affirmed over the meritless claim that the court erred by combining cost shifting pursuant to section 2030 with sanctions pursuant to section 271, making no explicit differentiation between sums awarded pursuant to each statute.
Local News and Events
Sep 01, 2021
Any contract is a set of promises that is legally enforceable. Breaking the agreements set by the contract can result in one party taking legal action against the other. If you negotiate a contract without…
Read More »
Read More »
Aug 02, 2021
Kids get into a lot of mischief and seldom intend to cause serious harm or damage to property. Unfortunately, sometimes high jinks go too far and could lead to an encounter with the law. When that happens,…
Read More »
Read More »
Jul 15, 2021
When vehicular homicide is charged, you need an experienced defense attorney. Vehicular homicide is a serious charge and can change your future permanently. You need an attorney who is experienced in fighting…
Read More »
Read More »
Jun 01, 2021
Medical malpractice covers a broad range of actions or inactions that result in harm to those under the care of medical professionals. Although doctors, nurses and similar practitioners are only human…
Read More »
Read More »